Abuja, NIGERIA — The University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN) has formally denied ever issuing a Bachelor of Science degree certificate to the current Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation, Uche Nnaji. This revelation has reignited discussions surrounding allegations of certificate forgery that have shadowed Nnaji since his nomination to President Bola Tinubu’s cabinet in July 2023. As thel fabric of Nigerian politics is often interwoven with issues of academic integrity and public accountability, this case raises critical questions about the qualifications of individuals in positions of power and the implications of such controversies for governance.
The origins of the controversy trace back to July 2023, shortly after President Tinubu’s inauguration on May 29. Nnaji was included in the first batch of ministerial nominees, a decision that came under scrutiny almost immediately. Questionable claims regarding his academic qualifications surfaced, leading to allegations that he had never completed his university education at UNN. These assertions were bolstered by assertions from critics who insisted that both his supposed bachelor’s degree and the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) certificate he presented for official verification were counterfeit.
In the Nigerian context, where educational qualifications are integral to credibility in governance, such accusations carry significant weight. The subsequent public outcry prompted calls for transparency and verification of Nnaji’s credentials, resulting in a Freedom of Information request directed at UNN.
On October 2, 2025, Professor Simon U. Ortuanya, the Vice-Chancellor of UNN, publicly addressed the issue in a letter responding to the inquiry. In his detailed response, Ortuanya confirmed that Nnaji was indeed admitted to the university in 1981, but crucially, it was noted that he “failed to complete his programme” and, consequently, “was never issued a certificate.”
“We can confirm that Mr. Geoffrey Uchechukwu Nnaji, with Matriculation Number 1981/30725, was admitted by the University of Nigeria, Nsukka in 1981. From every available record and information from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, we are unable to confirm that Mr. Geoffrey Uchechukwu Nnaji graduated from the University of Nigeria in July 1985, as there are no records of his completion of study in the University of Nigeria, Nsukka,” Ortuanya wrote.
This official statement by UNN marked a significant moment in the controversy, adding a formal acknowledgement of Nnaji’s incomplete education to the public discourse surrounding his qualification. With his status as a member of the Nigerian cabinet at stake, the implications of this denial could be severe, potentially questioning his legitimacy and fitness for office.
The implications of UNN’s assertion are far-reaching. In Nigeria, the educational qualifications of public officials are not merely procedural; they are vital to the moral and ethical standards expected from leaders. The integrity of the government hinges on the credibility of its officials, and allegations of certificate forgery strike at the heart of public trust.
Uche Nnaji’s position as the Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation necessitates a high level of expertise and credibility. In an era where technological advancement is a priority for national development, questions about the minister’s academic honesty could undermine confidence in the government’s ability to effectively lead initiatives vital to Nigeria’s progress in science and technology.
Furthermore, allegations of educational fraud can trigger a broader examination of the vetting processes employed during ministerial nominations. The failure of these processes to adequately verify the credentials of nominees raises concerns about transparency and accountability within the government. This situation emphasizes the necessity for institutional reforms to ensure that individuals in positions of authority are genuinely qualified to serve and contribute meaningfully to public affairs.
The scrutiny surrounding Nnaji’s credentials is not an isolated incident. In Nigeria’s political landscape, previous controversies over academic qualifications have resulted in resignations, legal battles, and even disqualifications. High-profile figures such as former ministers and state governors have faced intense public backlash when their educational claims were challenged, often resulting in significant political fallout.
This trend underscores a growing societal expectation for integrity among public officials. The public’s appetite for transparency has increased, reflecting a desire for accountability in governance. As a result, allegations like those against Nnaji serve as a reminder that academic qualifications are not just formalities; they are essential to legitimizing authority and fostering public confidence in government institutions.
In light of the university’s statements, Nnaji’s defense becomes paramount. While he has not publicly responded to the UNN’s denial as of yet, previous statements and his background might play a crucial role in shaping his narrative. Politicians in Nigeria often rely on public relations strategies to navigate such controversies, emphasizing their contributions and commitments to the nation while downplaying allegations against them.
Moreover, Nnaji may seek legal recourse to counter the allegations and protect his reputation. The potential for legal action could become a focal point in the ongoing saga, as both Nnaji and his detractors aim to establish credibility and vindication amidst the controversy.
The political ramifications of this incident extend to the Tinubu administration’s overall image as well. As the government strives to solidify its position, maintaining cabinet members with clean records and exemplary integrity must be a priority. The trust placed in the Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation is contingent upon the resolution of these allegations and how they are perceived by the Nigerian populace.
The scandal surrounding Nnaji’s credentials speaks to a larger issue in Nigeria — the rampant culture of certificate fraud within the educational system. For years, reports have emerged highlighting the sale of fake certificates and the complicity of some educational institutions in issuing dubious qualifications. This predicament not only tarnishes the reputations of innocent graduates but also perpetuates a cycle of mistrust in higher education across the country.
Addressing this societal malaise will require concerted efforts from all stakeholders—government agencies, educational institutions, and civil society organizations. Legislative reforms aimed at strengthening verification processes and ensuring strict penalties for fraudulent activities could play a pivotal role in mitigating the negative impact of certificate forgery in Nigeria.
As the controversy around Uche Nnaji unfolds, one lesson becomes unmistakably clear: integrity in public service is non-negotiable. The allegations of certificate forgery that have arisen not only threaten Nnaji’s political career but also raise fundamental issues about accountability in Nigeria’s leadership. The university’s unequivocal denial serves as a critical reminder that academic integrity is essential for fostering public trust and effectively governing a nation.
In a democratic society, the qualifications of elected and appointed officials must be above reproach, standing as a testament to their capability to lead and represent the populace. The ongoing debates surrounding Nnaji’s credentials should catalyze a broader dialogue about the importance of transparency and accountability in governance, encouraging reforms that prioritize ethical standards in Nigerian politics.
As this story develops, one can only hope that it ignites the changes necessary to uphold the principles of integrity and public service in Nigeria, ultimately restoring faith in those who govern and set the direction of the nation’s future. The denouement of the current controversy surrounding Uche Nnaji may very well shape the roadmap for political accountability and academic integrity in the Nigerian political milieu for years to come.
Discussion about this post