As the tenure of Dr. Muheeba Farida Dankaka as the Executive Chairman of the Federal Character Commission (FCC) officially winds down on July 2, 2025, it is imperative to undertake a professional, yet unflinching examination of her administration. Her term, which began with much promise and the hope of repositioning the FCC as a beacon of equity, fairness, and national integration, has unfortunately devolved into a grim tale of inefficiency, administrative high-handedness, job racketeering, and institutional erosion.
Founded to foster national cohesion by ensuring fair representation of all regions in public institutions, the FCC is a vital organ of Nigeria’s governance architecture. The principle of federal character is enshrined in the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which mandates equitable distribution of positions in public service across all federating units. However, under Dr. Dankaka’s leadership, this noble mandate has been mired in controversies and apparent contradictions.
Dr. Muheeba Farida Dankaka assumed office as the Executive Chairman of the FCC with a background in business and the private sector. Her appointment was greeted with cautious optimism, particularly as she became the first female to occupy the role. Expectations were high that her administration would usher in a new era of transparency, inclusivity, and proactive enforcement of the federal character principle.
Unfortunately, these expectations were dashed. Instead of strengthening the FCC’s oversight capabilities and reinforcing its constitutional mandate, her tenure has come to symbolize administrative decay, unethical practices, and internal discord of a scandalous magnitude.
Perhaps the most damning hallmark of Dr. Dankaka’s administration is the persistent allegation of job racketeering. In 2023 and 2024, the National Assembly summoned Dr. Dankaka and several key FCC officials over damning testimonies of job sales and shady recruitment processes. The revelations that emerged from these proceedings shocked the nation.
One of the most explosive testimonies came from an FCC staff member who courageously revealed that jobs were being sold under the table, with proceeds allegedly funneled directly to the Executive Chairman. According to the testimony, employment slots that should have gone to qualified Nigerians from marginalized states and zones were auctioned to the highest bidders, often ranging between ₦2 million and ₦5 million per slot.
This practice not only violated the principle of federal character but also entrenched a culture of corruption and betrayal of trust. The very commission mandated to enforce fairness and equal opportunity was actively subverting these ideals for pecuniary gain under Dr. Dankaka’s watch.
In a rare show of defiance within a federal institution, staff of the FCC staged demonstrations, calling on the President, His Excellency Bola Ahmed Tinubu not to reappoint her. The protest, held at the commission’s headquarters in Abuja, brought to public attention the pervasive dissatisfaction among employees. Placards bearing inscriptions such as “Stop the Vendetta,” “We Deserve Promotion,” “Dankaka Must Go,” and “No to Corruption,” clearly illustrated the depth of frustration within the workforce. Meanwhile, while the protest was ongoing, it was alleged that she hired thugs that staged counter protest. The thugs exposed themselves when they failed to answer questions from journalists on their mission as regards to the their counter protest. Their leader couldn’t pronounce the name of the Executive Chairman they were “fighting” for. Also, the counter protesters fought themselves when they couldn’t share properly, the money they were given.
At the heart of the protest were allegations of incompetence, executive vendetta against perceived dissenters, a complete freeze on staff promotion, and the outsourcing of routine assignments to private consultants. Rather than empowering internal departments and boosting capacity, the administration consistently sidelined competent civil servants in favor of cronies and political contractors.
The refusal to implement staff promotion exercises, despite years of eligible service and qualifications, contributed to unprecedented low morale. This anti-worker posture contradicted every principle of institutional leadership and human resource management.
A particularly bizarre feature of Dr. Dankaka’s administration was the systemic outsourcing of the Commission’s core functions to external consultants. Rather than entrusting tasks to the Commission’s own competent staff, she persistently awarded contracts to consultants — often without due process — to carry out assignments clearly within the FCC’s purview.
This approach not only drained public resources but also rendered career staff redundant and disillusioned. The consultants were paid handsomely for jobs that could be more effectively and economically handled in-house. This practice fostered opacity and further opened the floodgates to abuse, nepotism, and institutional compromise.
Dr. Dankaka’s tenure has also been marred by widespread reports of autocratic decision-making and an unwillingness to carry fellow commissioners and senior officials along. At various points during her tenure, rancor erupted between the Executive Chairman and other commissioners, leading to public spats and a series of petitions to oversight authorities.
Her leadership style was often described as authoritarian and divisive. Decisions were routinely taken without consultation, and a culture of fear allegedly pervaded the Commission. Several commissioners accused her of marginalizing them in both decision-making and operations, in clear violation of the FCC’s enabling Act which prescribes a collegial, consensus-driven governance structure.
These internal fissures not only stalled key policy decisions but also severely dented the Commission’s credibility in the eyes of Nigerians and development partners alike.
The Federal Character Commission is tasked with ensuring equitable representation and fair distribution of opportunities among Nigeria’s diverse regions. Its failure under Dr. Dankaka can be analyzed through the following core functions:
Despite the FCC’s responsibility to bridge representation gaps, the last five years have witnessed an alarming deepening of these imbalances. Rather than rectifying historical marginalization, her administration reportedly exacerbated them through the sale of employment slots, favoritism, and nepotism.
Recruitment across federal ministries, departments, and agencies (MDAs) became more opaque, and merit was sacrificed on the altar of financial gain and political patronage. The result is a federal service increasingly riddled with under-qualified personnel and regional disproportionality.
Administrative inefficiency became a defining feature of Dr. Dankaka’s leadership. From inadequate working materials to poor coordination and weak monitoring systems, the Commission under her command functioned far below its expected standard.
Numerous audit queries and internal reports documented irregular expenditures, unauthorized contracts, and financial misappropriation. A general sense of demoralization and cynicism among staff became the new normal, thereby paralyzing the Commission’s operations.
Rather than harmonizing equity with competence, the FCC under Dankaka leaned heavily toward patronage. The perception — and in many cases the reality — was that appointments were influenced by ethnicity, personal loyalty, and financial inducement, rather than qualifications or experience.
This practice eroded meritocracy in public institutions and discouraged excellence, thus further weakening the integrity of Nigeria’s federal workforce.
Perhaps the most consequential failure of her tenure was the FCC’s collapse as a monitoring and enforcement body. While previous administrations had built modest systems for compliance audits across MDAs, these systems either collapsed or were deliberately ignored under Dr. Dankaka.
No meaningful penalties were imposed on erring institutions. The Commission became a toothless bulldog, and its reports were either non-existent or perfunctory. Worse still, allegations surfaced that monitoring reports were doctored or withheld in exchange for bribes from defaulting agencies.
By all available indices, Dr. Muheeba Farida Dankaka is exiting the Federal Character Commission with a legacy steeped in controversy, disappointment, and institutional regression. Rather than entrench fairness and national unity, she presided over a regime marked by corruption, disunity, and the deliberate weakening of one of Nigeria’s most constitutionally significant institutions.
Her administration will be remembered not for reform or innovation, but for job-for-sale syndicates, staff victimization, poor worker welfare, and a general atmosphere of administrative impunity. The Commission — rather than being a force for integration — became an emblem of everything the federal character principle was designed to prevent.
As a new leadership prepares to take over from July 3, 2025, the challenges ahead are enormous. The next Executive Chairman must be someone of unquestionable integrity, administrative competence, and genuine commitment to Nigeria’s diversity project.
Priority areas must include: Institutional Rebuilding: Restoring internal structures, morale, and professionalism. Audit and Accountability: A full probe into the activities of the Dankaka era, with possible prosecutions where crimes were committed. Merit-Federal Balance: Building a new framework that harmonizes federal character with competence. Monitoring and Enforcement: Strengthening enforcement tools and imposing real sanctions on violating institutions.
The tenure of Dr. Muheeba Farida Dankaka at the helm of the Federal Character Commission stands as a cautionary tale in Nigeria’s quest for national unity and administrative justice. It reveals how noble institutions, if entrusted to the wrong hands, can become counterproductive and even dangerous to the national ethos.
Her exit on July 2, 2025, should not be merely the end of a term — it must be the beginning of an era of reckoning, reform, and redirection. The Federal Character Commission, now more than ever, needs leaders who will uphold its original ideals — not undermine them for personal enrichment.
If Nigeria is to truly progress as one nation under law and justice, the FCC must be rescued from the ruins of the past five years and given a chance to become what the Constitution envisioned: a guardian of fairness, not a facilitator of fraud.
Discussion about this post