The Gabonese government has taken extraordinary action against its national football team after a disastrous showing at the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations, announcing the suspension of the squad, the dismissal of the coaching staff, and the exclusion of veteran captain Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang in a move that has sent shockwaves through African football.
Acting Sports Minister Simplice-Désiré Mamboula delivered the unprecedented decree on national television following Gabon’s elimination at the group stage of the tournament in Morocco. The Panthers, as the national side is known, finished bottom of Group F, losing all three matches — including a heartbreaking 3-2 collapse against defending champions Ivory Coast after holding a 2-0 lead. The string of defeats, which also included losses to Cameroon and Mozambique, provoked widespread criticism back home and triggered the government’s intervention.
“Given the Panthers’ disgraceful performance at the Africa Cup of Nations and the multifaceted effects that run counter to the values of our Republic, the government has decided to dissolve the technical staff, suspend the national team until further notice, and exclude players Bruno Ecuele Manga and Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang from the squad,” Mamboula said in the televised statement.

Aubameyang responded on social media, insisting that “the team’s problems are much deeper than the individual I am,” a remark that underscored broader issues within Gabonese football.
Reasons Behind the Government’s Harsh Measures
Officials cited not just the string of defeats but what they described as a broader failure in preparation, management and national pride. President Brice Clotaire Oligui Nguema is reported to have criticised the team’s performance as weakening a part of Gabon’s national identity, highlighting what he saw as “a lack of method and a dispersion of resources.”
The government’s intervention appears aimed at forcing structural changes within the Gabonese Football Federation (FEGAFOOT). Mamboula challenged the federation to take full responsibility for the team’s collapse, an implicit rebuke to the sport’s governing body in the country.
While Gabon had shown promise in qualifying for the tournament — a campaign boosted by strong performances in World Cup qualifiers — their inability to compete at AFCON highlighted persistent tactical and organisational shortcomings. Critics point to inconsistent coaching decisions, fitness issues among key players, and a lack of cohesion that undermined Gabon’s momentum.
The government’s heavy-handed decision raises the spectre of conflict with global football authorities. FIFA prohibits government interference in the autonomous management of national football associations, and the suspension of an entire national team by a state authority is virtually unprecedented in the modern era. Observers warn that Gabon could face sanctions, including suspension from future international competitions, if the federation’s independence is compromised.
African football experts note that while drastic measures in the face of poor results have historical precedent across the continent, the trend has waned as global oversight of sporting matters has tightened. Critics argue that firing players and dissolving teams does little to address underlying developmental challenges within national football systems.
Reactions to the government’s actions have been mixed. Some Gabonese supporters say decisive action was necessary to signal accountability and commitment to higher standards. Others, including international football commentators, warn that punishing players for systemic failures risks discouraging talent and destabilising the sport domestically.
Aubameyang’s international future remains uncertain, and the fate of Gabonese football will hinge on how the government and FEGAFOOT navigate the aftermath of this extraordinary intervention. With AFCON campaigns now concluded and attention turning to future qualifiers, all eyes will be on whether Gabon can rebuild its programme without running afoul of football’s global governance.
Discussion about this post