Nigerian politics has long been a theater of power plays, alliances, and fierce rivalries, but the recent public feud between Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has stirred the political waters in ways few could have anticipated. When Akpoti-Uduaghan accused Akpabio of sexual harassment, the country was thrust into a bitter standoff—one that not only questioned personal behaviour but also cast a spotlight on the larger dynamics of Nigerian politics, power, and gender relations.
This feature delves into why Akpabio—one of Nigeria’s most influential political figures—chose to launch such an aggressive counterattack against Akpoti-Uduaghan, a relatively new but ambitious political force. Was his response merely a defense of his personal integrity, or was there something deeper at play? Was this about survival in a political arena dominated by entrenched interests and delicate power balances?
The accusation came unexpectedly.
In a high-profile press conference, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan—an advocate for women’s rights and political reform—leveled a serious charge against Godswill Akpabio, accusing him of sexual harassment. According to Akpoti-Uduaghan, the sexual harassment took place in private meetings where Akpabio allegedly made unwelcome advances toward her, making her feel coerced into submission.
This allegation wasn’t just an accusation; it was a personal attack on Akpabio, a man who has been at the pinnacle of Nigerian politics for years. It threatened to unravel not only his reputation but also his carefully curated image as a strong, decisive leader.
However, Akpabio didn’t remain silent. Instead, he issued a vehement denial of the charges, describing them as politically motivated and part of a broader smear campaign aimed at undermining his influence. To his supporters, the accusations were nothing more than a fabricated plot to discredit a man who had achieved political greatness. But for many of Akpoti-Uduaghan’s supporters, it was a moment of reckoning—an opportunity to expose the systemic harassment faced by women in Nigerian politics.
For Godswill Akpabio, the stakes were monumental. His political legacy and future were on the line. Having held multiple powerful positions in the country, including as the Governor of Akwa Ibom State and now the Senate President, Akpabio’s name is synonymous with political prowess and influence. However, that influence has been clouded by allegations of corruption, accusations of authoritarian governance during his tenure as governor, and now, the sexual harassment claim.
In the complex world of Nigerian politics, image is everything, and leaders like Akpabio understand this better than most. His political career is intertwined with his ability to maintain a strong public persona, and any attack on that persona is seen as an existential threat. To Akpabio, defending himself wasn’t just about proving his innocence—it was about preserving his influence and legacy.
Akpabio’s political acumen is well known; he has navigated Nigeria’s deeply entrenched patronage networks, using alliances and favours to maintain power. For Akpabio, being accused of such a serious crime presented a direct challenge to his ability to continue to pull the strings in Nigerian politics.
Nigeria’s political system has long been criticized for being corrupt and unresponsive to the needs of ordinary citizens. Systemic issues like patronage, lack of transparency, and gender inequality have been central to the country’s political dysfunction. In this climate, Akpabio’s political methods, often seen as representative of the old guard, have been under increasing scrutiny.
However, the growing political and social movements in Nigeria—such as Akpoti-Uduaghan’s push for women’s rights and good governance—have clashed with the traditional powers. Her accusations against Akpabio were not just about personal grievances; they symbolized a broader struggle against the status quo that has long dominated Nigerian politics.
Akpabio’s decision to fight back aggressively can be seen as his effort to preserve the old order, one where power is maintained through loyalty and patronage, and where corruption is often overlooked in favor of maintaining stability and control.
As news of the accusations spread, the Nigerian public was divided. The case quickly became a symbolic battleground for those seeking to challenge entrenched political elites and those who still supported the old political guard.
On one hand, Akpoti-Uduaghan’s supporters praised her bravery in speaking out against sexual harassment, an issue often swept under the rug in Nigerian politics. Women’s groups, youth activists, and reform-minded politicians rallied behind her, viewing her as a victim who dared to expose the dark side of Nigerian political culture. For these groups, the case was not just about Akpoti-Uduaghan’s personal experience—it was about challenging the patriarchal structures that pervade the political landscape.
On the other hand, Akpabio’s supporters viewed the accusations as part of a larger conspiracy to unseat a respected political leader. Many of them dismissed the allegations as politically motivated and blamed Akpoti-Uduaghan for undermining a man who had served the country loyally. To them, Akpabio was a victim of a politically charged attack designed to weaken his authority and derail his ability to lead the Senate.
The response to the accusation mirrored the deep divisions within Nigerian society, where questions of power, gender, and corruption are constantly at the forefront of political discourse.
At the heart of this confrontation lies a stark ideological divide. Akpabio’s style of governance is deeply rooted in the old ways of Nigerian politics—where political power is often wielded in backrooms, through deals and exchanges, and where public service is sometimes secondary to personal interests. This patronage-based system has long served as the lifeblood of Nigerian politics, with leaders relying on a network of loyalists to maintain power.
Akpoti-Uduaghan rise to prominence was fueled by her focus on gender equality, anti-corruption measures, and youth empowerment. In many ways, she symbolizes the growing demand for political reform—one that challenges the entrenched power structures that have long existed in Nigerian politics.
By accusing Akpabio of sexual harassment, critics hold that Akpoti-Uduaghan was not only pointing to an abuse of power by an individual, but was also challenging the broader political system that allows such behaviour to persist. Her accusation was a direct challenge to the old guard, a faction within Nigerian politics that Akpabio represents.
Akpabio’s aggressive defense of his name was a clear attempt to push back against this growing wave of reform. In his eyes, the accusation wasn’t just an attack on him—it was an attack on the very system that had allowed him to rise to power. To maintain his relevance, he needed to reaffirm his position as a leader who was firmly entrenched in the traditional political order.
The issue of sexual harassment in Nigerian politics cannot be understated. Nigerian women in politics often face significant challenges, ranging from gender-based discrimination to outright harassment. For many female politicians, including Akpoti-Uduaghan, navigating this hostile environment requires immense strength and resilience.
Akpoti-Uduaghan’s accusations against Akpabio highlighted the deeply ingrained culture of impunity that exists in Nigerian politics. Harassment and exploitation of women are often brushed aside, with powerful figures like Akpabio largely immune to scrutiny. By speaking out, Akpoti-Uduaghan became a beacon for many women who have faced similar challenges but have been too afraid or powerless to speak out.
The stakes in this confrontation are far-reaching. If Akpabio is able to successfully dismiss the allegations and maintain his position as Senate President, it will signal that the old political system is alive and well—one where the powerful are protected and the marginalized continue to be silenced. For Akpabio, this victory would reaffirm his place within Nigeria’s political elite, ensuring that his influence is undiminished.
However, if Akpoti-Uduaghan’s accusations gain traction and the public demand for justice becomes overwhelming, it could spark a broader reckoning in Nigerian politics. Akpabio’s downfall could serve as a warning to other political leaders about the limits of their power and the consequences of exploiting it. It could mark the beginning of a more transparent, accountable political system—one in which the voices of women, youth, and reform-minded leaders are no longer ignored.
While Godswill Akpabio’s rise to prominence is largely attributed to his skillful maneuvering through the murky waters of Nigerian politics, there is an undercurrent of opinion that paints him as more of a puppet than a powerful figure in his own right.
In the current political climate, Akpabio is often seen as closely aligned with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, whose influence has been steadily growing since the latter’s ascension to the presidency. This perception has painted Akpabio as Tinubu’s stooge and political errand boy—a man who owes much of his current political stature to the patronage and support of the powerful Nigerian president.
Critics contend that Akpabio’s political maneuvers often reflect an steady loyalty to Tinubu, one that seems more rooted in personal survival and political allegiance than in authentic leadership. As Senate President, Akpabio’s actions frequently align with the president’s directives, implying that his leadership is more about advancing Tinubu’s political agenda than exercising independent judgment. This connection between Akpabio and Tinubu becomes particularly noteworthy in the context of his confrontation with Akpoti-Uduaghan.
It is well known that Tinubu, as the leader of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), wields considerable influence over the Nigerian Senate. In many respects, Akpabio’s role within the Senate is seen as an extension of Tinubu’s influence, positioning him as a loyal gatekeeper for the president’s policy priorities. On the other hand, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing the opposition People’s Democratic Party (PDP), stands as a direct challenge to this dominant political alliance. The battle between Akpabio and Akpoti-Uduaghan thus extends beyond personal rivalry—it is also a fierce contest between political parties, with the stakes high as both sides vie for control, including efforts to unseat Akpoti-Uduaghan from her seat as senator representing Kogi Central in the National Assembly in the 2027 elections.
For those who view Akpabio as little more than a puppet of Tinubu, his response to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s accusations seems like a calculated move to ensure that no challenge to the status quo is allowed to gain traction. His fierce defense against Akpoti-Uduaghan might be seen as part of a broader strategy to avoid upsetting the delicate balance of power that Tinubu’s administration depends on. Akpabio’s leadership in the Senate, under this lens, is not just about holding political office—it is about securing the interests of Tinubu and his allies, often at the expense of independent voices or reformers like Akpoti-Uduaghan.
The accusation of sexual harassment against Akpabio, when seen through this prism, becomes more than a personal matter. It becomes a political liability for Tinubu’s administration. If Akpabio were to lose his Senate position or be publicly discredited, it could destabilize the entire political strategy that Tinubu has crafted since his victory. With Akpabio often seen as a key political ally and enforcer of Tinubu’s policies, any weakening of his position could be seen as a blow to the president’s grip on power.
The accusation against Akpabio thus extends beyond a personal defense—it becomes an act of loyalty to Tinubu’s administration. Akpabio, as Senate President, wields significant power over legislative matters, and his decisions in this role are often aligned with the president’s vision for the country. In that sense, his loyalty to Tinubu is intertwined with his political survival, making any public challenge to his credibility potentially catastrophic for both men.
This dynamic makes Akpabio’s response to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s claims more than just an isolated incident. His aggressive defense can be viewed as a message to his political base, particularly those loyal to Tinubu, that he will not tolerate any threat to his leadership, no matter the cost. In this sense, the battle against Akpoti-Uduaghan is not just about personal reputation—it’s about protecting the political machinery that keeps Akpabio and Tinubu in power.
Moreover, the perception of Akpabio as a mere tool of Bola Tinubu raises larger questions about the concentration of power within Nigeria’s political elite. Critics argue that under the guise of political loyalty, Akpabio has surrendered much of his independence, and his every move is dictated by the will of the president. This patronage system, where loyalty to a political figure such as Tinubu takes precedence over independent governance, continues to undermine Nigeria’s political system.
Akpabio’s actions, therefore, must be understood within the context of political loyalty. By aggressively defending his reputation and authority, he is not only trying to preserve his political career; he is also ensuring that the alliance with President Tinubu remains unchallenged. For Akpabio, any threat to his position is a threat to the broader political interests of Tinubu’s administration—and that is something he is clearly willing to fight for at all costs.
In the larger context, Akpabio’s confrontation with Akpoti-Uduaghan sheds light on the tensions between old guard politicians like Akpabio, who rely on patronage and political allegiance, and voices like Akpoti-Uduaghan, who apparently are challenging the status quo – fighting for gender equality, political reform, and the very integrity of Nigerian governance.
As this political drama unfolds, the question remains: will Akpabio’s loyalty to Tinubu allow him to weather this storm, or will Akpoti-Uduaghan’s challenge spark a new wave of political change in Nigeria? The stakes are not just personal—they are national.
Discussion about this post