Namibia’s main opposition party, the Independent Patriots for Change (IPC), has announced plans to file a legal challenge against the results of the country’s disputed elections held on November 27, 2024. This move comes after a court ruling granting both the IPC and another opposition group, the Landless People’s Movement (LPM), the right to inspect key election materials as part of their efforts to substantiate claims of electoral malpractice.
The announcement of the legal challenge signals the latest chapter in a contentious post-election period, during which allegations of irregularities in both the presidential and parliamentary votes have dominated the political discourse in Namibia. The election, which saw the ruling South West Africa People’s Organisation (SWAPO) maintain its longstanding grip on power, has come under intense scrutiny as opposition parties, civil society organizations, and even some members of the public have raised concerns about its legitimacy.
On Friday, December 13, 2024, the Namibian Electoral Court delivered a significant ruling in favor of the opposition parties. The court granted the IPC and LPM the right to inspect a range of materials related to the election, including documentation detailing the number of votes cast and counted at each polling station. This ruling came just a day after the opposition parties petitioned the court for access to this critical election data, citing concerns about potential inaccuracies and malpractice during the voting process.
The opposition parties argue that irregularities during the election, such as a shortage of ballot papers and technical challenges with the voting system, had a substantial impact on the outcome of the vote. In some areas, polling stations were forced to remain open for up to three days in order to accommodate the delays caused by these issues, leading to further allegations of procedural mishandling.
While Namibia’s Electoral Commission has officially declared the election results as “free and fair,” the opposition’s challenge underscores the deep division over the election’s credibility. The IPC, led by former Member of Parliament, Dr. Panduleni Itula, has argued that the evidence they will gather from the inspection of election materials will be critical in demonstrating the flaws in the process. This material is expected to play a crucial role in the IPC’s upcoming court application on December 23, 2024, when the party plans to formally challenge the validity of the election results.
“We believe that the material we are seeking to inspect will reveal discrepancies in the vote counts and provide us with the necessary evidence to demonstrate that the election was not conducted in a fair and transparent manner,” said Dr. Itula in a statement following the court’s ruling.
In addition to the vote-counting data, the opposition parties are requesting access to other documentation, including voter registration lists, voter turnout statistics, and records of any changes made to the electoral roll before and after the election. The aim is to build a comprehensive case for why the election should be declared invalid and potentially subjected to a re-run in specific regions or nationwide.
The elections of November 27, 2024, were marred by several significant irregularities that have cast doubt on the legitimacy of the vote. One of the most significant issues was the shortage of ballot papers at polling stations across the country, which led to long delays and, in some instances, voting stations remaining open for up to three days. This disruption affected thousands of voters, particularly in rural and remote areas, and some opposition parties allege that these delays may have influenced the final vote counts.
Polling stations that remained open for extended periods raised questions about whether the elections were conducted in accordance with Namibia’s laws, which require polling stations to close at a specific time on the day of voting. The technical difficulties experienced with electronic voting systems in some regions further compounded these concerns, raising suspicions that the system may have been manipulated or that there were systemic failures in the process.
The IPC and LPM have pointed to these technical issues as evidence of flaws in the election process. “The fact that so many polling stations had to remain open for extended periods is highly unusual and raises serious concerns,” said LPM leader Bernadus Swartbooi in a statement. “We need to understand how these technical failures occurred and why they were not addressed in a timely manner.”
The opposition has also raised concerns about the transparency of the vote-counting process. In many areas, there were reports of delays in releasing the final vote tally, leading to allegations that the ruling SWAPO party might have benefited from these delays. The IPC and LPM argue that the lack of timely information regarding vote counts further erodes public trust in the election’s credibility.
Namibia’s Electoral Commission, however, has insisted that the election was conducted in a fair and transparent manner. In an official statement issued after the polls closed, the commission declared that “the election was free and fair, with no evidence of widespread fraud or irregularities.” The commission acknowledged the technical challenges and logistical issues but maintained that these were not significant enough to affect the overall outcome.
Despite the controversies surrounding the election process, the ruling South West Africa People’s Organisation (SWAPO) emerged victorious, extending its 34-year hold on power. SWAPO, which has dominated Namibia’s political landscape since the country gained independence from South Africa in 1990, won both the presidential and parliamentary elections, with its candidate Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah securing a commanding lead in the presidential race.
Nandi-Ndaitwah, Namibia’s first female president-elect, has dismissed the allegations of election flaws, describing them as baseless attempts to undermine the will of the people. In a statement issued after the court ruling, Nandi-Ndaitwah expressed confidence in the legitimacy of the election results, saying, “The election was free, fair, and conducted in accordance with Namibian law. We will not allow anyone to derail the progress we have made as a nation.”
President-elect Nandi-Ndaitwah, who will be inaugurated in March 2025, is widely seen as a continuation of SWAPO’s long-standing political dominance. Her election to the presidency marks a historic moment in Namibian history, as she will become the first woman to hold the office. However, her victory has also been clouded by opposition claims that the electoral process was fundamentally flawed and that her party’s grip on power was achieved through questionable means.
The legal challenge being mounted by the IPC and LPM highlights the deep divisions within Namibia’s political landscape. While SWAPO’s dominance remains unchallenged in many respects, there is a growing sense of dissatisfaction among certain segments of the population regarding the fairness and transparency of the electoral process. The opposition parties argue that the election process was tainted by inefficiencies and irregularities that disproportionately impacted certain communities, particularly those in rural areas where access to polling stations and voting materials was limited.
For many Namibians, the outcome of this legal challenge will serve as a crucial test of the country’s commitment to democracy and the rule of law. If the courts rule in favor of the opposition parties, it could set a precedent for future elections, ensuring greater transparency and accountability in the electoral process. Conversely, a ruling in favor of the Electoral Commission could further entrench SWAPO’s political dominance and silence growing calls for electoral reform.
“The outcome of this case will determine the future of Namibia’s democracy,” said IPC spokesperson, Salatiel Shikongo. “We believe that the people of Namibia deserve better, and we will continue to fight for a free and fair election process that reflects the true will of the people.”
As the legal challenge progresses, the political climate in Namibia is likely to become more charged. Tensions between the ruling SWAPO party and the opposition parties are expected to intensify, particularly as the date for the court’s decision draws nearer. Regardless of the outcome, the election disputes have sparked a broader conversation about the state of Namibia’s democracy and the need for greater electoral reforms.
Namibia, widely regarded as one of Africa’s most stable democracies, has prided itself on its peaceful transitions of power and its adherence to democratic principles. However, the recent election controversy has exposed vulnerabilities in the system and raised questions about the future direction of the country.
With the ruling SWAPO party’s hold on power firmly entrenched, many Namibians are hoping that the legal challenge will provide an opportunity for reforms that can address the systemic issues that have surfaced during this election. Whether this challenge will lead to substantive changes or further political polarization remains to be seen, but it is clear that Namibia’s political landscape is at a crossroads.
The upcoming legal proceedings will be closely watched both domestically and internationally, as they could have far-reaching implications for the country’s democratic future.
Discussion about this post