Friday, August 1, 2025
  • Who’sWho Africa AWARDS
  • About Time Africa Magazine
  • Contact Us
Time Africa Magazine
  • Home
  • Magazine
  • WHO’SWHO AWARDS
  • News
  • World News
    • US
    • UAE
    • Europe
    • UK
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Russia-Ukraine
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Column
  • Interviews
  • Special Report
No Result
View All Result
Time Africa Magazine
  • Home
  • Magazine
  • WHO’SWHO AWARDS
  • News
  • World News
    • US
    • UAE
    • Europe
    • UK
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Russia-Ukraine
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • Column
  • Interviews
  • Special Report
No Result
View All Result
Time Africa Magazine
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • WHO’SWHO AWARDS
  • News
  • Magazine
  • World News

Home » World News » Supreme Court rejects 89-year-old man’s plea to divorce his 82-year-old wife

Supreme Court rejects 89-year-old man’s plea to divorce his 82-year-old wife

October 13, 2023
in World News
0
546
SHARES
4.6k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Supreme Court of India has dismissed a divorce appeal by 89-year-old man to divorce his 82-year-old wife, insisting that “marriage is still considered to be a pious, spiritual and invaluable emotional life-net between husband and wife in Indian society”.

The case involved Dr. Nirmal Singh Panesar, the appellant, and Mrs. Paramjit Kaur Panesar, the respondent. Dr. Panesar, a retired Air Force officer, had filed

A bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M Trivedi, while dismissing the husband’s plea on October 10, said, “It would not be desirable to accept the formula of ‘irretrievable break down of marriage’ as a strait-jacket formula for the grant of relief of divorce under Article 142 of the Constitution of India.”

“Despite the increasing trend of filing divorce proceedings in the courts of law, the institution of marriage is still considered to be a pious, spiritual, and invaluable emotional life-net between the husband and the wife in Indian society,” the court said in its 24-page judgment.

The bench noted in its order that the wife was willing to look after her husband and had no plans to leave him in their later years, saying she didn’t want to die as a divorcee.

ReadAlso

Sex not part of woman’s ‘marital duties,’ court rules in divorce case

Super Eagles player seeks divorce, demands N1bn damages from UK-based pastor

Bringing down the curtains on a 27-year-old marital discord, the Supreme Court refused to grant divorce to a couple in the “late evening of their lives” saying the institution of marriage occupies an important place and plays a key role in the society.

The court order said, “In contemporary society, it may not constitute stigma, but here we are concerned with the respondent’s (wife) own sentiment. Under the circumstances, considering and respecting the sentiments of the respondent wife, exercising the discretion in favour of the appellant under Article 142 by dissolving the marriage between parties on the ground that the marriage has irretrievably broken down, would not be doing complete justice to the parties, it would rather be doing injustice to the respondent.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“In our opinion, one should not be oblivious to the fact that the institution of marriage occupies an important place and plays an important role in society… It is governed not only by the letters of law but by the social norms as well. So many other relationships stem from and thrive on the matrimonial relationships in the society. Therefore, it would not be desirable to accept the formula of ‘irretrievable breakdown of marriage’ as a strait-jacket formula for the grant of relief of divorce under Article 142 of the Constitution of India,” the bench said.

The top court noted the wife all throughout her life has maintained the sacred relationship since 1963 and has taken care of her three children despite the fact that her husband exhibited total hostility towards them.

“The respondent (wife) is still ready and willing to take care of her husband and does not wish to leave him alone at this stage of life. She has also expressed her sentiments that she does not want to die with the stigma of being a ‘divorcee’ woman. In contemporary society, it may not constitute a stigma but here we are concerned with the respondent’s own sentiment,” the bench said, in its order dated October 10.

It said, “Under the circumstances, considering and respecting the sentiments of the respondent wife, the court is of the opinion that exercising the discretion in favour of the appellant (husband) under Article 142 by dissolving the marriage between parties on the ground that the marriage has irretrievably broken down, would not be doing “complete justice” to the parties, would rather be doing injustice to the respondent. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to accept the submission of the appellant to dissolve the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage.” Justice Trivedi, who penned the verdict on behalf of the bench, noted that the husband, who is a qualified doctor and retired from the Indian Air Force, had initiated divorce proceedings in March 1996 under the Hindu Marriage Act on grounds of ‘cruelty’ and ‘desertion’ by his wife, a retired teacher.

The man alleged that his estranged wife had treated him cruelly and deserted him by not joining him when he was transferred to Madras, and thereafter not taking care of him though he had a heart problem. He had further claimed the wife had made complaints to the Air Force authorities against him to malign his image and these were the acts of ‘cruelty’, entitling him to a decree of divorce.

He submitted in the top court that they have been staying separately since the time he had filed the divorce petition in the district court, and the marriage having been irretrievably broken down, the apex court should exercise its plenary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution and grant a decree of divorce.

On other hand, the wife submitted in the top court that she being an aged lady, does not want to die with the stigma of a “divorcee” and she had made all efforts to respect the sacred relationship between the parties all through out and is still ready to look after her husband with the assistance of her son. She submitted that a mere long period of separation could not tantamount to irretrievable breakdown of the marriage and her husband had failed to make out any ground either of ‘cruelty’ or ‘desertion’.

The wife urged the top court not to interfere with the order of the high court, which has accepted her plea of not granting divorce.

The bench said looking at the fact that both the parties are in the “late evening of their lives”, the court had expected them to sit together and explore the possibility of an amicable settlement. The effort having failed, the court decided to adjudicate the matter on merit, the bench said.

According to lawyers, the couple’s relationship had turned sour when the husband, who had served in the Indian Army, was stationed in Madras in January 1984 and the wife chose not to accompany him. Instead, she opted to reside initially with her husband’s parents and later with her son.

The district court had allowed the plea of the husband to dissolve the marriage but the Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside the district judge’s order, following which he approached the Supreme Court.

Tags: divorceIndia Supreme Court
ADVERTISEMENT
Previous Post

Scientists track ‘alarming’ melt in Antarctic ice shelves

Next Post

Corruption is actually less in Africa than other parts of the world – Akinwumi Adesina

You MayAlso Like

News

Ex-president found guilty of bribery and witness tampering

July 29, 2025
Israel-Hamas

Israel Airdrops Food Into Gaza As It Rebuffs Famine Claims

July 27, 2025
Middle-East

The Taliban are remaking Afghanistan in their image. It should have us all worried

July 25, 2025
Middle-East

Hundreds Dead From Hunger in Gaza, Including Dozens of Children

July 25, 2025
Thai soldiers are seen during a visit by Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva, following armed clashes on a disputed border area between Cambodia and Thailand, at a makeshift camp in Surin province, 30 km (19 miles) from the Thai-Cambodia border, April 27, 2011. Thai and Cambodian troops clashed with heavy artillery for a sixth day on Wednesday near two disputed 12th-century Hindu temples, the Cambodian defense ministry said following a night of shelling that killed a Thai villager. To date, the fighting has killed at least 14 people and sent more than 50,000 into evacuation centres. REUTERS/Sukree Sukplang (THAILAND - Tags: POLITICS MILITARY CONFLICT)
World News

The Fighting Between Thailand and Cambodia Isn’t About Territory

July 25, 2025
UAE

How Saudi Arabia’s Sleeping Prince was kept alive For 20 years on a hospital ventilator

July 20, 2025
Next Post
Akinwumi Adesina

Corruption is actually less in Africa than other parts of the world - Akinwumi Adesina

Eight UN peacekeepers in DR Congo detained over misconduct

UN suspends and detains 8 peacekeepers in Congo over allegations of sexual exploitation

Discussion about this post

BLACK SUNDAY: Islamic Terrorists attack Catholic Church, killing at least 34 Worshipers 

New Male Contraceptive Pill Tested

Kidnapped Nigerian Catholic Priest Regains Freedom after 51 Days in Captivity

Dangote daughters take on growing leadership roles as billionaire tycoon steps back

Breakthrough HIV jab to be supplied to millions at knock-down price

Nigeria came from two goals down to defeat Morocco 3-2 in final Women’s Africa Cup of Nations

  • British government apologizes to Peter Obi, as hired impostors, master manipulators on rampage abroad

    1239 shares
    Share 496 Tweet 310
  • Maids trafficked and sold to wealthy Saudis on black market

    1065 shares
    Share 426 Tweet 266
  • Flight Attendant Sees Late Husband On Plane

    969 shares
    Share 388 Tweet 242
  • ‘Céline Dion Dead 2023’: Singer killed By Internet Death Hoax

    902 shares
    Share 360 Tweet 225
  • Crisis echoes, fears grow in Amechi Awkunanaw in Enugu State

    735 shares
    Share 294 Tweet 184
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

British government apologizes to Peter Obi, as hired impostors, master manipulators on rampage abroad

April 13, 2023

Maids trafficked and sold to wealthy Saudis on black market

December 27, 2022
Flight Attendant Sees Late Husband On Plane

Flight Attendant Sees Late Husband On Plane

September 22, 2023
‘Céline Dion Dead 2023’: Singer killed By Internet Death Hoax

‘Céline Dion Dead 2023’: Singer killed By Internet Death Hoax

March 21, 2023
Chief Mrs Ebelechukwu, wife of Willie Obiano, former governor of Anambra state

NIGERIA: No, wife of Biafran warlord, Bianca Ojukwu lied – Ebele Obiano:

0

SOUTH AFRICA: TO LEAVE OR NOT TO LEAVE?

0
kelechi iheanacho

TOP SCORER: IHEANACHA

0
Goodluck Ebele Jonathan

WHAT CAN’TBE TAKEN AWAY FROM JONATHAN

0

Aboh Monarch Extols Diaspora Contributions To Nation Building

July 31, 2025

Pzafaama Helping Hand Foundation to Empower 500 Less Privileged Pupils in Nigeria

July 30, 2025

Nigeria’s Borrowing Binge, Poverty Soars | By Peter Obi

July 30, 2025

Dangote daughters take on growing leadership roles as billionaire tycoon steps back

July 30, 2025

ABOUT US

Time Africa Magazine

TIME AFRICA MAGAZINE is an African Magazine with a culture of excellence; a magazine without peer. Nearly a third of its readers hold advanced degrees and include novelists, … READ MORE >>

SECTIONS

  • Aviation
  • Column
  • Crime
  • Europe
  • Featured
  • Gallery
  • Health
  • Interviews
  • Israel-Hamas
  • Lifestyle
  • Magazine
  • Middle-East
  • News
  • Politics
  • Press Release
  • Russia-Ukraine
  • Science
  • Special Report
  • Sports
  • TV/Radio
  • UAE
  • UK
  • US
  • World News

Useful Links

  • AllAfrica
  • Channel Africa
  • El Khabar
  • The Guardian
  • Cairo Live
  • Le Republicain
  • Magazine: 9771144975608
  • Subscribe to TIME AFRICA biweekly news magazine

    Enjoy handpicked stories from around African continent,
    delivered anywhere in the world

    Subscribe

    • About Time Africa Magazine
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • WHO’SWHO AWARDS

    © 2025 Time Africa Magazine - All Right Reserved. Time Africa is a trademark of Times Associates, registered in the U.S, & Nigeria. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • WHO’SWHO AWARDS
    • Politics
    • Column
    • Interviews
    • Gallery
    • Lifestyle
    • Special Report
    • Sports
    • TV/Radio
    • Aviation
    • Health
    • Science
    • World News

    © 2025 Time Africa Magazine - All Right Reserved. Time Africa is a trademark of Times Associates, registered in the U.S, & Nigeria. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service.

    This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.